Now that we’ve
spent the last month watching the symphony progress over time, what would you
say is your favorite era for the symphony? Do you have a favorite symphonic
composer or piece?
My favorite era
has to be the Romantic period (roughly the 19th-century). As far as
a favorite piece, I always say you cannot go wrong with Beethoven! However to
avoid sounding cliché, I will go with Dvorak’s Symphony No. 9 “From the New
World.” I enjoy Dvorak’s ability to create nationalistic music and, though not from
America, I believe he creates an outstanding American idiom in this piece.
The 20th-century
brought more changes to the symphony. One major movement that developed is
known as neoclassicism. This term refers to the attempt to reach back to older
musical forms from the Baroque and Classical periods as a reaction to the
dramatic, emotional compositions created during the Romantic period. Many
composers used chamber ensembles to perform their symphonies (similar in size
to those used during the early classical period) rather than orchestras of 200
musicians. Some used elements including counterpoint and fugue in their work,
combining it with modern ideas of tonality. Stravinsky and Hindemith are
examples of neo-classical composers.
Still other
composers expanded on symphonic ideas by adding quotations from other popular
tunes (Ives), simplifying and repeating rhythms through minimalism (Glass),
using newly-invented electronic instruments (Messiaen) amongst many other new
techniques.
Today I would
like to take a closer look at one 20th-century symphony written by William
Grant Still: his Afro-American Symphony. Living during a time when
African-Americans were excluded from the classical music world, Still achieved
great things by becoming the first African-American to conduct a symphony
orchestra in the U.S. as well as the first to have an opera produced by a major
opera company. His symphonic writing incorporated many American idioms within
the European symphonic design (four-movements). Several of the uniquely
American characteristics Still incorporates include jazz elements and plantation
spiritual references.
Tonight’s 6
o’clock symphony features Still’s Afro-American Symphony. Give it a listen and
let me know if you hear these distinctly American elements.
Following
Beethoven’s expansion of the symphonic model, composers of the Romantic period
(roughly 19th-century) sought to create longer and larger symphonies
with heightened passion. The number of composers and symphonies from this
period seems endless so we’ll focus on just a few major names in today’s
discussion.
At this point in
history, it was not uncommon to see an orchestra of over 200 people! Composers
began to expand movement lengths and some even added one or even two movements
to the standard four-movement model. Some composers used vocalists in their
symphonies (Mahler) while some attempted to create national idioms (Borodin,
Sibelius, Dvorak). Some created programmatic music that told audiences a story (R.
Strauss, Berlioz), while some created what is known as absolute music, sticking
to the standard symphonic tradition of music for music’s sake (Brahms,
Schumann, Schubert). Some composers even added non-orchestral instruments to
their works such as Saint-Saens in his Symphony No. 3 “Organ.”
Tchaikovsky’s
Symphony No. 4 is a great example of a symphony from the Romantic period. You
may remember it from the Cincinnati Symphony’s One City, One Symphony concert
this past fall. The symphony is dedicated to Tchaikovsky’s best friend and
patron, Mrs. Nadezhda von Meck, a wealthy widow with whom he passed many
letters but never met. It contains a program that assists audiences in
following the symphony’s message.
Tchaikovsky describes
the first movement of the Symphony No. 4 as having an introductory theme that
represents fate. This main theme returns throughout the work. During this
movement, Tchaikovsky depicts his desire to escape into daydreams rather than
facing the reality of life. The “fate” theme returns, however, reminding him of
the truth of his gloomy circumstances that may have included his failed
marriage to Antonina Miliukov or even his questions regarding his sexual
orientation.
The second
movement depicts feelings of melancholy, nostalgia, pain, longing, and
reflection on distant memories. The solo oboe at the beginning is meant to
portray a lonely person. A march in the middle of the movement takes the
listener away from the feelings of isolation exhibited thus far. The longing,
lonely melody always returns in various instrumentations.
The third
movement contains a series of arabesques that represent strange, unrealistic,
unconnected dreams. Many of the themes show-off a particular instrument’s
technique (example: piccolo solo).
The fourth
movement reflects the joy that comes from surrounding yourself with other
people when you are depressed (opening melody). To help depict the sense of community, Tchaikovsky uses
the Russian folksong “In the Field a Birch Tree Stood.” The reminder of fate
(main theme from first movement) always returns, however, bringing you back to
reality and discontentment.
Tchaikovsky
considered this his best symphonic work saying, "It seems to me that this
is my best work…What lies in store for this symphony? Will it survive long
after its author has disappeared from the face of the earth, or straight away
plunge into the depths of oblivion? I only know that at this moment I... am
blind to any shortcomings in my new offspring. Yet I am sure that, as regards
texture and form, it represents a step forward in my development..."
You can listen to
Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 4 here. How do you think Tchaikovsky expanded upon
the symphonic model built a century earlier?
Ludwig van
Beethoven: a pivotal figure in music history. But why? We cannot properly
discuss the historical development of the symphony without mentioning Beethoven
and his contributions to the music world.
Beethoven lived
during a period of change and struggle. The French Revolution, Industrial
Revolution, and the Age of Enlightenment are all things that may have
influenced the composer and his work. With various changes in society came
changes in music. Beethoven’s personal life exhibited its own sense of struggle
as he fought deafness. Fighting to overcome this trial, Beethoven reflects this
will to overcome in his Symphony No. 3, known as the “Heroic Symphony.”
Beethoven’s
symphonic output expanded the length of the symphony as well as the size of the
orchestra. His scores often times called for piccolo, trombone, and extra
percussion and strings in comparison with composers of the classical period.
His most
triumphant and influential work is the Symphony No. 9. Using a chorus in the
final movement, Beethoven used Schiller’s Ode
to Joy as the text. The grandeur, emotional complexity, and innovativeness
of this piece are what make it memorable. Nothing like the Symphony No. 9 had
ever been created and, in my opinion, nothing like it has been created since.
Beethoven raised the bar high for symphonic composers who followed him, making
it difficult to expand on his accomplishment.
You can listen to
Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9 here. It’s a long one so hang tight! After you
finish listening, let me know your thoughts. Can you see how this piece is
known as a pivotal point in music history?
Wolfgang Amadeus
Mozart was another prominent composer working during the latter part of the 18th-century.
Though younger than Haydn, people actually became accustomed to his name
earlier because he toured as a child prodigy along with his father and sister.
While Mozart’s
early symphonies followed the early-classical model containing a three-movement
structure, his later symphonies fell into the four-movement format. Mozart’s
compositional style stretched performers by creating ambitious parts for (now
common) wind sections. Sometimes, he would even tag on a slow introduction to
the opening fast movement. These introductions are typically written in the
style of a French overture and may create suspense for audiences who have no
idea what Mozart intends next. Mozart’s orchestra size was similar to that of
Haydn, much smaller in number than what we are used to seeing in concert halls
today.
As mentioned
during our 21 Days of Bach this past March, Mozart was also known to combine
his classical-era style with idioms from the Baroque period. His Symphony No.
41 “Jupiter,” for instance, draws on the Baroque fugue in its final movement.
Mozart’s “Prague”
Symphony will be tonight’s 6 o’clock symphony. Written for a concert in that
city, it is certainly one of Mozart’s great works that exhibits the symphonic
style of the late classical era. How does it compare with the Haydn symphony
you heard on Tuesday?
This month, we
are exploring the development of the symphony throughout history. Entering the
latter half of the 18th-century, we have prominent composers such as
Haydn and Mozart who added their own individual marks to this ever-evolving
orchestral genre.
Known as the
“father of the symphony,” Joseph Haydn spent the greater portion of his life
working for the royal Hungarian Esterházy family. This explains Haydn’s
extensive output as he was expected to compose a variety of works at any given
moment for court entertainment.
Esterháza Palace Courtesy of wikipedia.org
Following
Stamitz’s model, Haydn typically employed the four-movement structure in his
symphonies. He was known to create various themes that he would then develop
and vary throughout the rest of the work. He also sought to create tuneful,
expressive compositions. His orchestra, though perhaps a bit larger than those
earlier in the century, still had no more than twenty-five to thirty-five
members compared to up to one hundred found on stages today.
Haydn was known
as a jokester, this quality exhibiting itself throughout many of his works. His
Symphony No. 45 “Farewell” was written as a hint to Prince Nikolaus Esterházy
to allow his orchestra members to return home to see their families after an
extended stay at the prince’s summer home. During the final part of the
symphony, members of the orchestra gradually begin to put their instrument down
and walk off the stage, leaving only two violins at the end!
Haydn’s Symphony
No. 94 is known as the “Surprise” symphony. Do you know why? Tune in for tonight’s
6 o’clock symphony to hear this fun work and let me know what you think.
We cannot discuss
the early development of the symphony without mentioning Mannheim. The Mannheim
court was known to have an excellent music scene, the orchestra led by composer
Johann Stamitz. The orchestra at Mannheim was known for its excellent dynamic
control, particularly the sudden crescendos (growth from soft to loud). As a
composer, Stamitz was known to use this “Mannheim Crescendo” in his work.
Mannheim Court Courtesy of wikipedia.org
Significant to
the development of the symphony, Stamitz was the first composer to consistently
use a four-movement structure when composing rather than the three-movement
plan that was standard at the time. Adding a minuet and trio movement between
the slow movement and the final fast movement became standard with many
prominent composers to follow later in the era.
Another
significant change to the symphony within the Mannheim court was the addition
of wind instruments including oboe, horn, and even an occasional clarinet!
Listen to
Stamitz’s Sinfonia in E-flat major here:
What new features
do you notice about this symphony in comparison with the Sammartini symphony we
looked at last time?
Giovanni Battista
Sammartini was one of the early classical composers who worked on writing
symphonies. As mentioned on Monday, I often find it easy to mistake an early
symphony score for a string quartet.
Scored for
four-part strings with a possible harpsichord, Sammartini’s Symphony No. 32 in
F major has the standard three-movement structure of that time period (see Monday’s
post). Unlike standard symphonies of today, this work takes less than ten
minutes to perform with a much smaller orchestra than what we’re used to seeing
on stages today.
Here is a
recording of Sammartini’s symphony:
What are you
initial impressions based on your modern-day experience with symphonies?
Listening to WGUC
each day, you may notice the ample amount of symphonies played. You may also
notice the extensive variety among the various symphonies, many differing
from one another based on the time period during which they were composed. This
month, let’s explore the history of the symphony, mapping out a timeline that
will show just how the symphony developed throughout history.
The symphony is a
large orchestral work that developed in the mid-eighteenth century. Divided
into a specified number of movements, we will soon see that the standard number
of movements changed over time. The early symphony was thought to have its
roots in the Italian opera overture (known as sinfonia), which typically used a
three-movement format:
Movement 1: Fast
tempo
Movement 2: Slow
tempo
Movement 3: Fast
tempo
They symphony
also was thought to resemble a classical sonata, only written for an entire
orchestra rather than a solo instrument with possible accompaniment.
Looking at a
musical score, I find that often times it’s easy to mistake a string quartet
for an early classical symphony. Why? Most early symphonies were scored for
four-part strings, just like a string quartet. It wasn’t until a bit later that
various wind instruments began to enter the orchestral scene.
Join me Wednesday
as I explore one of the earliest symphonic composers, Giovanni Battista
Sammartini.
With the
instant success of George Gershwin’s Rhapsody
in Blue in 1924, Paul Whiteman and his orchestra performed the piece an
additional 83 times that year. The Victor Blue label decided to record the work
and it ended up selling over one million copies. People across the nation heard
it either in live performance, on the radio, or through recordings. Gershwin
was even surprised to see that the sheet music was a hit! Print reviews
continuously raved that this new work bridged the gap between serious and
popular music.
With its great
success, it’s no wonder that we see melodies reminiscent of those in Rhapsody in Blue pop up in some of
Gershwin’s later songs. Some of these titles include “The Man I Love,” “Fascinating
Rhythm,” “Bidin’ My Time,” and “Embraceable You.”
Rhapsody in Blue was not only a
hit among classical music listeners, but it became somewhat of a popular
American icon as well. One popular
modern-day usage of Rhapsody themes
can be found in United Airline advertisements. United bought the rights to
Gershwin’s work in 1987 for $300,000 per year.
Is Rhapsody in Blue your favorite of
Gershwin’s works? If not, what other piece do you prefer?
Al
Hirschfeld Drawing of George and Ira Gershwin Courtesy of pinterest .com