This week let’s
look at a 19th-century dispute over “absolute” music and
“programmatic” music. Absolute music is the idea of music for music’s sake and
included people such as Johannes Brahms who believed that music is a complete
and beautiful work in and of itself and does not need support from outside
sources. Brahms often times used these past composers as models on which he
expanded with his own ideas.
As an advocate of
absolute music, music critic Eduard Hanslick wrote the following in his book, On the Musically Beautiful: “What kind
of beauty is the beauty of a musical composition? It is a specifically musical
kind of beauty. By this we understand a beauty that is self-contained and in no
need of content from outside itself, that consists simply and solely of tones
and their artistic combination…”
On the opposite
side of the issue, supporters of programmatic music wanted something new in
their music that pointed away from the past. These composers used outside sources
such as poetry, stories, visuals, etc. to enhance the meaning in their music.
Often times, the composition would be accompanied with an actual program that
explained the story and meaning linked to this outside source. Composers such
as Wagner, Liszt, and Berlioz make up this group of programmatic composers that
was coined the “New German School” by music critic Franz Brendel in 1859.
Though Liszt and Berlioz were not actually German by birth, Brendel considered
them German in spirit due to their use of Beethoven as a model. Other composers
who used this programmatic technique include Bruckner, Wolf, R. Strauss, and
Mahler.
Later this week
we will look at an example of both absolute music and programmatic music. Do
you prefer the idea of music for music’s sake or do you enjoy an accompanying
program? Let me know your thoughts…there are no wrong answers!